The Class

I had my first feature-writing class last night, and afterwards, I was ready to quit. Matt had never seen me so depressed.

For one thing, I’m the only male in the class. The other 13 students and the teacher are all female.

Some gay men thrive around women; others feel alien around them. I’m the latter. Around most men, particularly most gay men, I can take comfort in a range of strong but familiar emotions: lust, envy, competition, empathy, identification, distaste, admiration, curiosity. Around most women, I don’t know how to act or what to feel. Women are not as psychologically resonant for me, or at least the resonance is too buried.

And I’m not comfortable enough in my manhood to be “one of the girls”; I don’t like playing the token gay guy. One of the exercises last night was to take 10 minutes and privately brainstorm on a sheet of paper about what topics we might want to use for feature articles. Everything I wrote down revolved around homosexuality. Gay marriage; closeted gay spouses (since the McGreevey thing has been in the news); gay dating; gay legal issues. The teacher, Beth, asked for volunteers to read theirs, and I didn’t volunteer, because I knew that if I did, I’d immediately be the token gay guy. (When I mentioned this to Matt, he asked me if any of the women were lesbians. I don’t know. If there were, they weren’t obvious.)

So there’s that.

Besides that, feature writing just doesn’t seem fun. I’m probably totally overreacting or focusing on the negative and unfamiliar, but anyway: Beth referred to a few types of feature articles, and among these are things called “charticles,” which appear to be articles in the form of charts, or snippets of text accompanied by graphics. There’s also service journalism, which doesn’t move me.

Near the beginning of class, Beth passed out a bunch of magazines to illustrate different types of articles. Except for two or three, they were all women’s magazines. (Fortunately, I got the New Yorker.) I don’t want to write dumb little personality-less pieces. I want to be like Michelangelo Signorile or Dan Savage or Andrew Sullivan or someone like that. I want to write gay stuff.

Perhaps blogging has spoiled me, but I really want to write about things that I’m interested in and that show my personality.

And I’m being so stupid here, because of course I can write stuff like that. It’s just a matter of appropriating the things from the class that I need, of putting my own stamp on my experience of it.

I was depressed last night because I’ve wrapped up my three-year commitment to my job, so I’m free to leave without penalty, but what am I going to do now? Work at this job until I retire? Go through life without making anything of myself? And if I do want to make something of myself, go for some sort of goal, is it going to be unpleasant? I want life to be fun and as stress-free as possible.

I saw an opening for myself, some hope, a possible way out of the boredom, only to realize it was a mirage. That’s not a good feeling. Brick wall. Is this all that there is in life?

I don’t feel quite as negative as I’m making this all out to be. I’m just trying to describe all of it so I can work through it, which I’ve already begun to do.

So I’m not quitting the class, and I’ll see what I can do with it.

9 thoughts on “The Class

  1. Pingback: The Tin Man » On Quitting

  2. Sounds like you’re putting a lot of pressure on this class and the role it will play in your life if you’ve deemed it a mirage after only one sitting. Maybe what is a mirage is the expectations you thought it could fulfill? I certainly am no expert, but when things seem out of kilter for me, I always stop and think about “what kind of life am I trying to create for myself?” Once I get clarity around that, then I can subordinate other options and choices (work, etc.) as means to this greater end. Whenever I focus on just one thing (jobs, relationship, or the like) I seem to get even more disjointed.

  3. Your blog writing is about what you know, what you do (to a point, what you enjoy and what you’re passionate about. Travelling with loved ones and sharing experiences etc. Wouldn’t that give you some starting points, or ideas to ponder. Don’t be put off by being the one guy in the class. All the girls are probably glad you;re there. Its a bit like guys doing cooking at school decades ago. It wasn’t really done, because it wasn’t considered cool. Now the blokes are the celebrity chefs, master chefs, iron chefs etc. You’re not token anything. You’re 100% you and you’ve got lots to offer. Its just a matter of how best to present it.

  4. I enjoy your blog alot. It is great that you want to expand your reach writing-wise.

    I am sure that there is a potential friend (or at least pizza companion) within that group. Don’t pigeonhole them right off the bat, Jeff.

    No need to be the token gay guy. Be the MODEL gay guy. Show them how it’s done…. ;)

  5. Surely there are other, similar classes in Manhattan. Demand a refund due to the gender-bias, claim you feel sexually oppressed — never pass up an opportunity for new material. Then changes classes. You’ll know if it’s about being the solitary (gay) male entity, or some other, perhaps sublimated reason.

    There are truly writing careers where you get to write only about the things that easily interest and spark your mind. But, these careers, generally, are a great deal less lucrative and much harder to eat, sleep, and drink on income wise. Compromises are always necessary in this universe.

    rob@egoz.org

  6. utterly randomly (via nycbloggers, so not “utterly”) i came across your blog. i teach features 2 at gotham; i used to teach features 1. last term, i had 10 women and one guy in the class. I was the token fag, but i was in control, so it didn’t matter too much. anyhoo, you shouldn’t let beth’s girl-centrism prevent you from writing. it’s just a group of people. reading and writing. try taking an online class. those are much less interactive… anyhoo, good luck.

Comments are closed.