An Insider’s Take on an Outsider’s Take on Blogging

An Insider’s Take on an

Outsider’s Take on Blogging

I’ve come across an interesting critique of blogging. It was written by a friend of mine. I think the analysis is pretty accurate and interesting and worth reading.

I should point out that I think it’s applicable only to blogs in which an author discusses his or her personal life. There are plenty of blogs out there that deal only with current events, or media happenings, or linkage, or whatever, and reveal next to nothing about what’s going on in the author’s life.

And yet there are low entry costs to blogging. Go to Blogger and you can set one up in minutes. Those low entry costs encourage a wide selection of people to create blogs. Anyone can do one. And most people like to write about what they know. And the things that most people are most informed about are their own lives. So a majority of blogs probably do serve primarily as personal diaries.

The piece raises several issues I’ve thought about before.

“Blogging sets up an incentive to create and overanalyze issues.”

I happen to know that that that sentence was prompted, at least in part, by some of my recent entries. So I’d like to comment.

I’m not quite sure the statement is true, at least not with respect to me. I don’t create and overanalyze issues because I blog; I blog because I create and overanalyze issues. If I didn’t blog, I would still create and overanalyze issues. It’s just that the blog gives me a public forum in which to do so.

But on the other hand… hmmm. Publish or perish, right? We all like having readers. And the best way to draw more eyeballs (and, more importantly, to keep those eyeballs) is by making sure your blog becomes a habitual read, which you do by updating your blog regularly. And this creates pressure to write — even when I may not have anything exciting to say. And it’s possible that in recounting my day in a way that makes it accessible to my audience, I’ll come up with things I hadn’t thought about. And that I’ll write about those things.

But is that bad? Well:

“I believe these ruminations ultimately do the primary author a dis-service. I’m all for analysis. But sometimes it’s good to stop and let the world go by. I would argue that a number of bloggers get so caught up in the very practice of blogging that they prevent themselves from enjoying any one day too much… I often wonder how paths would change if a compulsive blogger simply took a vacation for awhile.”

Okay. As a compulsive blogger, I think that’s a valid point. Again, though — if I weren’t writing about these thoughts, I’d still be thinking them. At least with a blog I’m exposed to some alternative viewpoints instead of thinking my thoughts in a echo chamber.

Also, I get to meet new people.

I can’t say I haven’t thought about it, though. Sometimes I try to remember what things were like before my life had a glass wall (or a translucent one, anyway). I like the interaction it’s brought me, though. So I’ll keep doing it.

Here’s a great issue:

“What happens when bloggers do things with people in real life, especially those who don’t blog but nonetheless know the blog exists? What happens is that the outsider starts reading about him or herself on a Web site. Social engagements become akin to those anxious meetings with journalists—you’re never sure what exactly will be on or off the record.”

Excellent point, one I’ve worried about. If I meet someone who reads my blog, will that reader feel inhibited when we hang out? If the reader starts to worry about being written about, that could get in the way of natural human interactions.

And it causes problems not only for the written-about reader, but for the writer, too.

It’s something I didn’t think about until I started meeting some of my readers. Until then, the barriers between blog and life were relatively watertight. When I started to meet my readers, I needed to create rules.

I’ve made it a practice not to write too much about the readers I’ve met. I once met one of my readers and thought he was totally cute, but I didn’t write about it here, because I was afraid of what he’d think if he knew.

(And yet, I haven’t heard from him since I first met him. Perhaps he just doesn’t want to read about himself here.)

Also, I rarely use a person’s real name here — reader or otherwise — unless the person is a fellow blogger, or unless it would be pointless to protect the person’s identity. For example, Mike and I know some of the same people, and he’s already used their real names, so there’s really no more identity-protecting I can do there.

In general, though, I try to avoid embarrassing a reader. I try not to reveal something that the reader wouldn’t want other people to know. If I had sex with a reader, I don’t think I’d write about it here.

This non-embarrassment clause also applies to people I interact with through e-mail or Instant Messenger or whatever.

Blogging is a power. It is a power that must be used wisely. It is a power that can fall into the wrong hands. (Cue “Lord of the Rings” theme music here.)

It is a power that can be used as a cop-out. If you want one of your readers to know something, and it would be embarrassing or awkward to tell that thing to the person directly, it could be tempting to tell the person by writing about it in your blog instead.

That isn’t something I’ve done yet — I don’t think. But it’s certainly possible. Because it’s easier.

And of course, there’s another danger in blogging — an obvious danger. A danger you can’t protect against. It’s the danger that someone in your life reads your blog regularly — and you, the writer, don’t know it.

Yikes.

And there’s a paradox inherent in quasi-anonymous personal blogging, too. On the one hand, I like getting more readers. On the other hand, I get nervous that some of those new readers will be people who I don’t want reading my blog: employers, parents, elderly relatives, or people who are mentioned here. For instance, when I agreed to be interviewed for an AP article about blogging a few months ago, I was thrilled by the possibility that it could bring in more readers. But it didn’t — and now, because of that article, you can find my blog by typing my name into Google. That was a big mistake on my part.

We bloggers — those of us who write about our personal lives, anyway — often adhere to the fiction that our blogs are unconnected to the real world, that what we write about doesn’t affect anything outside the blogging universe, that we can write whatever we want, that we don’t have to worry about how our words might affect others.

It’s important to remember that the walls are not watertight, that we don’t live in a parallel universe.

Only in a postmodern one.

5 thoughts on “An Insider’s Take on an Outsider’s Take on Blogging

  1. As the author of the cited article, let me be the first to congratulate you on a terrific response–just what I expected. Indeed, your blog has been an inspiration for my own recent online ramblings, which all too often smell like a cheap imitation. Is my own site starting to look like a blog?! We all drown in deconstruction, I guess. Again, well done.

  2. There must be something in the air.

    I’m struggling with the same issues at this moment (better: the last 6 posts were about it on my website more or less).

    My boyfriend started his own journal and he’s reading mine. Yikes! Suddenly I found out I was deleting setences, avoiding certain subjects, twisting my language. Something I did not intend to do in the first place.

    I have to say that most of the time I write about a specific subject in which people around me are illustrative to the subject at hand, than that I analyse a lot of what has happened to me during the day and what it means to me. My life is pretty average and boring ;-)

    A lot of the subjects are outside events, like something I read in the newspaper. But lately I’ve been very focused on my belly button because my own life (moving to a new house and a busy job) doesn’t leave much room for the outside world.

    And all of the issues written down in the critique of Russ popped up suddenly.

  3. But then again, I can’t count how many times has an opportunity to do something interesting but a little frightening come up and I went ahead and did it by telling myself “at the very least least it will be an interesting blog entry.”

    In that case, I think it’s good because it lets up take a step back from our lives and size things up in a more objective fashion.

  4. Always assume someone else is reading your blog, especially the person you would least like to….I wrote a number of scathing critiques of a coworker of mine, and thought it was OK because, after all, no one I knew in rl knew I had a blog and I didn’t know anyone online in rl. Apparently she had done a Google search with my name (or her boyfriend had), read the entire thing and our relationship is strained and ugly to this day. For some reason it can be easy to forget that a blog is not just a big online notebook — at least it is for me, anyway. (The feeling this person was constantly reading over my shoulder to make sure I didn’t say anything else about her, after I removed all of the offending comments, was a large factor in putting my blog on hiatus for at least right now. Plus, I’m also having a number of bad health problems and just don’t feel like blogging about them at the moment.)

  5. Very interesting, and very relevant to what’s going on in my own mind right now. A friend wrote me an e-mail this week with some quite personal stuff in it. At the end, she said “please don’t put any of this on your weblog.” I was appalled that she thought I might do this. I’m becoming ever more conscious of boundaries in what I write, and I think that wrestling with them is, for me, the only troubling aspect of the whole act of blogging.

Comments are closed.