I’ve been thinking about sex lately. (No surprise; I think about sex a lot.) More specifically, I’ve been thinking about sex in the context of relationships, and about why it’s so important.
I grew up being really afraid of sex. Sex seemed wrong, bad, an act of misbehavior. The idea of sex or sexual desire made me feel incredibly guilty.
Lately I’ve been reading The Tristan Chord: Wagner and Philosophy by Bryan Magee, a book about the opera composer Richard Wagner and the various philosophies that influenced him and his work – particularly the philosophy of Arthur Schopenhauer. The other day I came across a sentence in the book describing one of Wagner’s views about his Ring Cycle:
“[Wagner] is saying that sexual intercourse is the highest of all human activities provided it is an act of love embraced freely on both sides.
That left my mind reeling.
Sexual intercourse! The highest of all human activities! Wagner said this! A creator of some of the most sublime and complex operas known to humanity – high art on which countless academic treatises have been written – art which upstanding members of society dress up in their best finery and congregate in ornate, bejeweled opera houses in order to experience – music one can spend a lifetime studying without uncovering all of its secrets – and one of his great themes is sex and how holy it is! Crude, raw, unabashed sex!
The dichotomy between, on the one hand, my deep-seated negative feelings about sex, and on the other, Wagner’s elevation of it to a theme of great art, kind of threw me.
Later in the book I came across this passage, which absolutely floored me:
It is not given to many people to be mystics… there are other ways in which it may be possible for the rest of us, says Schopenhauer, to see into the heart of things, if only momentarily. These are, to state the matter baldly, sex and art…
Schopenhauer was puzzled that philosophers had given so little consideration to sex… philosophers have thought and written endlessly about death, yet they have given scarcely any consideration to conception – which is even more important to us than death, surely, and every bit as mysterious. Each human being who has ever lived was created by an act of sexual intercourse. There must be, so to speak, a metaphysics of this… [Schopenhauer] thought that for most of us the sex drive is the strongest impulse after those whose concern is the self-preservation of the individual, and that awareness of sex is ever-present, albeit subliminally, in our minds – which is why any allusion to it, however oblique, or any double meaning, however accidental, is picked up instantly. Decades before Freud, he regarded sexuality as something that tinges the whole human personality, and he perceived an element of sexual motivation as ever-present in human behavior. So he believed that understanding an individual’s sexuality was essential to understanding that individual. The fullest expression of the individual personality is in a loving sexual relationship, in which, perhaps paradoxically, the barriers and limitations of selfhood are transcended, the individual loses his sense of self and experiences oneness with the other person in the sexual act. [Schopenhauer said:] “If I am asked where the most intimate knowledge of that inner essence of the world, of that thing in itself which I have called the will to live, is to be found, or where that essence enters most clearly into our consciousness, or where it achieves the purest revelation of itself, then I must point to ecstasy in the act of copulation. That is it! That is the true essence and core of all things, the aim and purpose of all existence.”
I didn’t really have sex until I was 24. I was terrified of it, and it certainly didn’t help that the sex I was thinking about was gay sex. But what we fear is what we crave. And once I came out at 24, everything changed. Not right away – my first few sexual escapades left me terrified, for no good reason, that I might have caught a disease (a fear that’s never really gone away). But once I accepted myself and my sexuality, I felt a change within myself. Up to that point, I’d been a divided person. I’d had an internal barrier. I was my own enemy. But once I came to accept who I was, everything inside me unified. I became a whole person. And part of that was an enjoyment – no, a love – of sex.
What I love about sex is what I used to fear most about it. At its best, sex makes you step outside yourself. Well, that’s not really accurate: what I mean is that it makes you step outside the self that you present to the rest of the world. But what I really mean is that at its best, sex makes you become yourself. To have really great sex, you have to let yourself be taken over by, you have to give in completely to – not merely the other person, but the act itself, and the emotions, the sense of being, the sense of you, that it creates. In the best sex, all the barriers you normally put up against the rest of the world are stripped away, and there you are, in all your raw, chaotic self-ness. You’re completely vulnerable.
And since sex is something you have with another person, the best sex necessarily requires you to open yourself up to that other person. It requires letting that other person see you in all your vulnerability, all your rawness. Letting that other person see you.
When you have sex with someone for the first time, whether you’ve known that person for minutes or years, you’re really encountering that person for the first time again. You see the real self inside that person, unmediated by any social niceties or civilizing influences. You see into that person’s inner depths. You see, finally, the person.
That’s why sex is such a necessary part of a loving relationship. If people in a loving relationship are not having, do not have, sex, they’re withholding essential truths about themselves from each other. They’re withholding themselves from each other. There’s not a real trust. It might be there on a conscious level, but not on a deeper level. Something is missing. It’s not complete.
That’s why sex is necessary. So you can be who you really are.
So you can be real. Together.
Aww…that was sweet and profound. I’m glad you are enjoying the book! Wagner was a sex-addict, that’s pretty clear. But he had these ideas about sex which were pretty cool. On that level of interpretation, things start to go wrong in the Ring in the first scene when Alberich, realizing that he’s not going to find love with the Rheinmaidens, steals the gold to give himself ultimate power as a substitute for love (crap, now I’ve got Madonna in my head singing “subsitute for love”). In Parsifal, Amfortas suffers not because he had sex with a Jew (she’s not a Jew!), but because he allowed himself to be seduced for pleasure, instead of for love, which in the Schopenhauerian world of self-abnegation, doing anything for sheer pleasure is the worst sin there is. One might say, “Hmpf, that’s awfully preachy of Wagner!” but then if you consider is hypersexual personal life, you see what he’s really doing is confessing (in a much, much more mature and sophisticated form than he did 40 years earlier in Tannhauser) that he, like Amfortas, is struggling tremendously with a burden of guilt related to a pleasure-centered life.
Well said Jeff.
Thank you for that nicely structured and purely interesting essay on a topic that is sure to grab everyone’s attention. You successfully delivered your message, and reminded me of the basicality and primal nature of sex, and how it lives in our core, no matter how civilized and advanced we as humans become. Higher brain function does not lessen the need for raw, don’t hold back, sweaty, selfish and also giving, sex.
Hey Jeff,
I read “The Tristan Chord” a year ago in preparation for attending the Ring Cycle in Chicago. Picked it up at a remainder table in Powell’s. What a great book! Reading it made me understand myself a little better as well as providing a good grounding in Schopenhauer. Now I know why I’ve been obsessed with “Tristan” for forty years.
As you can guess from our past dialogue, I think of sex as simply an extremely pleasurable means to an end. The pleasure was in my estimation a mechanism of God’s that was put in place to increase sex’s appeal to man, which primarily seeks pleasure by nature (via the Id). Without the release of endorphines and sex hormones that is associated with sex, sex itself would seem altogether disgusting, and no one would partake in it, thus leading to the demise of our species. There is a very pragmatic purpose to this thing called sex, and all other aspects besides the practical are either mechanics or byproducts of it, mindblowing though they may be.
Oh, the other aspect of sex that I forgot to mention is that of sealing relationships, but procreation plays an equal role in this function of sex. Even putting our sexual nature aside, it is doubtful that marriages would be able to survive, considering emotional factors alone, were it not for sex.
Wow, Little Cicero, you would be absolutely no fun at all at the Ring Cycle.
Wouldn’t that make ME the Tin Man- no emotion, no passion
Hey, maybe I’ll post myself singing “If I Only Had a Heart”
This is so true.
Little Cicero,
I hate to say it (well, no I don’t), but your song should be “If I only had a brain.”
Do all of these experts leave room for the idea that sex is a really fun thing to do? Regardless of whether it’s inside or outside a relationship, it’s fun. You want to do fun things with the person you love. Sometimes you want to do fun things with your friends. Sometimes you want to do fun things with complete strangers.
It’s not all that complicated and I think people sometimes overthink things and drain all the fun away.
I once had a marching band director who, when a competing band begain playing The Ring, said he had no idea how a composer of such genius could write something that was so boring.
I think I’ve been insulted by Dave in KC.
Good catch, Little Cicero!
The line is sung by the Scarecrow in “The Wizard of Oz.” You seem to be familiar with straw men. :>)
Are you sure? I thought it was the tin man. Yes, it must have been the tin man who sang “If I only had a heart” because in a George Strait song, he wishes he was the tin man so he “wouldn’t have a heart” to be broken anymore. Jeff, you settle this.
Oh, never mind, so the scarecrow sang “If I only had a brain” and the Tin Man sang “If I only had a heart”. And the lion sang “If I only had courage”???
The lion’s song was “If I Only Had the Noive.” (Nerve)
Eureka! I am definitely seeing the Wizard of Oz this weekend. And maybe a Dairy Queen Moolatte to go with it. Have you ever had a Moolatte Tin Man?
No clue what that is. But sounds like my kind of sublimating!
Nice that where you live, the Dairy Queens are open for business in March, eagerly dishing up the soft serve. Wait, that didn’t come out quite as wholesome as I meant it.
I have never had a Moolatte.