Oh, this is rich.
As Talking Points Memo says in response, “What are the odds of a piece on airport restroom trysts appearing below a picture of Larry Craig in a conservative group’s newsletter, not to mention the reference to Craigslist?”
Incidentally, the Idaho Values Alliance is calling for Craig to resign.
Wow. That site is hilarious — and disturbing. And is it just me, or does the Executive Director of the \”Idaho Values Alliance\” look a child molestor?
And why does the Idaho they advocate not sound like all that \”friendly\” a place to raise a family?
Some choice points:
The Judeo-Christian tradition says that the standard for identifying the truth is that “by the mouth of two or three witnesses every fact is confirmed.†The senator’s guilty plea, when added to the officer’s testimony, satisfies the biblical standard for confirming the essential truth of what happened, and unless the senator can provide a compelling and convincing explanation for his plea, we will need to regretfully accept that the fact of his behavior has been established.
WTF???
…I received approximately five dozen emails and phone calls from homosexuals and gay sympathizers from all over the country yesterday afternoon and evening. The one thing they all shared in common was an unseemly glee over the senator’s apparent fall from grace.
Not one expressed compassion for the senator, or for the toll this incident must be taking on his family. To have such utter disregard for the anguish involved in this circumstance, from the very people who pride themselves on their compassion, is both revealing and disappointing. Perhaps they are not the paragons of tolerance they imagine themselves to be.
Why should we have compassion for a hypocrite who has attacked our rights?
…the Party should regard participation in the self-destructive homosexual lifestyle as incompatible with public service on behalf of the GOP….It is time for the Republican Party to be the party that defends the American family in word, deed, and by personal example.
Maybe the Log Cabin Republicans will finally wake up…
lol
This is another bit that struck me as weird:
It is a little-acknowledged secret that many active homosexuals will have more than 1,000 sex partners over the course of a lifetime (the average among heterosexuals is seven – still six more than we were designed for)
My first thought was “Wow. I’m seriously under quota!”
But I don’t get this about humans being “designed” only for one sexual partner. One could make the argument that women as “designed” for only one partner at a time, but there’s nothing in the design — or in the Bible, which I guess these people consider the design manual — that says she can’t have a different father for each pregnancy. It would seem, however, that men are “designed” to have as many sexual partners as we can — why else would we have a sexual cycle of a 20 minutes as opposed to 28 days? The Bible, of course, permits polygamy. And King Solomon has 900 sexual partners (he must have been gay, I guess).