Glenn Greenwald criticizes Alito’s conduct:
The Justices are seated at the very front of the chamber, and it was predictable in the extreme that the cameras would focus on them as Obama condemned their ruling. Seriously: what kind of an adult is incapable of restraining himself from visible gestures and verbal outbursts in the middle of someone’s speech, no matter how strongly one disagrees — let alone a robe-wearing Supreme Court Justice sitting in the U.S. Congress in the middle of a President’s State of the Union address? Recall all of the lip-pursed worrying from The New Republic‘s Jeffrey Rosen and his secret, nameless friends over the so-called “judicial temperament” of Sonia Sotomayor. Alito’s conduct is the precise antithesis of what “judicial temperament” is supposed to produce.
So… do you think it’s right to break precedent on the Presidential side and criticize a Supreme Court ruling in the SOTU?
Yeah — as I said in my previous post, I don’t see what the big deal is. They’re another branch of government. They’re not gods.
Oops, I only read the top post and didn’t scroll down to your prior post.
Hehe, no worries.
Obviously, Alito knows that the ruling was corrupt and unconstitutional. Obama hit a nerve.