I’ve been reading The Story of Britain, by Rebecca Fraser. It’s a survey history of Britain from ancient times to the present, and I’m enjoying it. I took a British history course in college, but I’d forgotten a lot of it.
My college course was a year-long class, and I had wildly different professors in the fall and spring. The fall professor, who covered English history up to 1688, was old-fashioned and histrionic. All I really remember is him telling us the tale of the princes in the tower in this wildly over-the-top and dramatic manner.
The second half covered British history from 1688 to the present, and I enjoyed it much more – in part because I found the modern era more interesting, and in part because the professor was much more sane and coherent and analytical.
This book is bringing it all back, and filling in the gaps I’d missed. It focuses more on the monarchs in the first half, but once it gets to the 18th or 19th century, it turns into a more general history. I’m about 70% through the book, up to the middle of the Victorian era.
One great thing about reading this book is that I’ve finally memorized the order of the English monarchs from William the Conqueror to the present. I was already mostly familiar with the Tudors onward, but everything before that just seemed like a mishmash of Henrys, Edwards and Richards. No more; now it all makes sense. Along with the book, this Wikipedia page has been pretty helpful in getting things straight, particularly this simplified family tree.
Also, since I’m much more familiar with American history, it’s always interesting to see it from the British point of view. The American Revolution is a pretty big deal. The War of 1812 is barely mentioned; although it was a major milestone in the formation of an American national identity, the British were much more occupied at the time with Napoleon’s takeover of Europe (although they did manage to burn the White House to a shell). The U.S. Civil War matters because of its effect on the cotton trade. It’s kind of like those books or movies where you encounter the same events from wildly different points of view.
I love history so much. I don’t know why. I’m kind of addicted to learning, although sometimes my brain capacity is too small for my ambitions: I can’t read as fast as I’d like to, and I can’t remember as much of what I read as I’d like to, either. Still, I love it.
Cool. I will add this to my growing to-read list. Last year I had this grand plan to read one biography of each of the U.S. presidents in historical order, which got sidetracked by reading about the Revolution, which got completely sidetracked by my current obsession with ballet. Right now I’m reading a big sprawling book on ballet history. (In fact right now I’m on a chapter on its development in Britain.)
Are you reading Apollo’s Angels? I saw some reviews of it and it seemed interesting.
As for my reading list, I’ve downloaded so many book samples to my Kindle that I’ll never read them all. Dozens of samples. If I find an interesting book on Amazon, I click on the button to download a sample to my Kindle, so the next time I turn on my Kindle wifi, it shows up. And what’s cool is that a longer book usually means a longer book sample.
Pingback: The Tin Man » Prince Charles Breaks Record
Exactly, yes, Apollo’s Angels. The history is really interesting, though I find the way it’s told kind of wandering.
I now have a Kindle (Thom’s previous-generation hand-me-down, now that he’s gotten a new one) and I’m starting to accumulate samples as well.
P.S. Oops, I usually sign comments here with my full name just so there’s no confusion. :)