The Met

I gave myself an extended Labor Day holiday — I took Tuesday and Wednesday off from work this week.

I largely wasted Tuesday. I sat around all day until the late afternoon, when, in a panic, I decided I needed to do something fun. (Yes, I am aware of the contradiction.) So I went for a long walk along Riverside Drive, and then I came home and watched Anatomy of a Murder, which I’d TiVo’d. Intriguing movie about a murder trial. Cynical plot, smart acting, great jazz score. And it deals with very raw themes for 1959. Jimmy Stewart actually utters the phrase “sexual climax.” JIMMY STEWART. Sexual climax! In 1959! There’s also discussion of panties, intercourse, and semen. This movie was released before the MPAA ratings system, when the motion picture code was still in effect, and I don’t understand how it got past the code.

One really cool thing about the movie is that the actor who plays the judge was, in real life, the attorney who represented the Army during the Army-McCarthy hearings before Congress, and uttered the famous words, “Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?”

Yesterday was better. I went to the Metropolitan Museum of Art. I hadn’t been there in a couple of years and I had a wonderful time. It was my first time there since they renovated the Greek and Roman galleries last year. They’re fantastic. I spent almost 90 minutes in those galleries alone, and it was especially interesting because I’ve been learning Latin lately and reading about ancient Rome. I also saw an exhibit of works by 19th century British painter J.M.W. Turner, as well as the Jeff Koons exhibit on the roof garden, where I looked out at the treetops of Central Park. It was a glorious afternoon.

I love looking at ancient objects. History smacks you in the face with its realness. These are actual objects that actual human beings touched — more than 2,000 years ago! I will stare at a Greek urn, scrutinize a piece of ancient Roman jewelry behind glass, and think to myself: ancient Greeks and Romans left the sweat of their fingerprints on this very object. The actual atoms that make up this object have been stuck together — buried underground, perhaps, but still intact — for the entire history of Western civilization; empires have risen and fallen, wars have been bought, scientific revolutions have occurred, and this object has persisted. History is real! You can read about it and it can seem as distant and fictional as J.R.R. Tolkien, but no — it all really happened. There really were people 2,000 years ago, 3,000 years ago, 10,000 years ago. It makes me feel small and insignificant — but at the same time I feel like I’m communing with them, these ancients across the centuries, these human beings who may as well be aliens.

It gives me shivers.

New York Accent

I just stumbled upon an article in the New York Times archives, from ten years ago, about the disappearance of the New York City accent.

Back in the 1960’s, Professor Labov, then at Columbia University, did one of the first studies to show that classic New Yorkese was linked to lower socioeconomic status. He figured that the correct use of the ”r” sound would be a good indicator of social position. In other words, the higher people’s social class, the more likely they would be to use the ”r” conventionally.

The professor went to three department stores — Saks, Macy’s and the now-defunct S. Klein — each catering to a different socioeconomic group, and asked employees for the location of a department he knew to be on the fourth floor. Sure enough, he soon discovered that that the clerks serving the more affluent shoppers in upscale Saks said ”fawth flaw” far less frequently than their peers at bargain-basement Klein’s, with Macy’s somewhere in the middle. A 1986 study using the same methodology (substituting the now-gone J. W. May’s for Klein’s) confirmed that the trend still existed, and it almost certainly continues today, Professor Labov said.

Palin’s Speech

Okay, I’m tired of writing about Sarah Palin. I’m tired of thinking about Sarah Palin. I want her to go away. But she won’t go away.

I don’t know what to make of her speech last night. She sure fired up the base. There’s no chance she’d leave the ticket now — she’s all in. Miers’s Supreme Court nomination tanked only because she lacked base support; the far right didn’t care a whit that she was unqualified to be on the Court. But Palin, they love her. And, of course, they don’t care a whit that she’s unqualified to take over the U.S. presidency.

Anyway, her speech seemed kinda… nasty. Negative. Snide. I don’t see how it wins over swing voters. I understand that sometimes the VP candidate is supposed to be the attack dog, but it didn’t sit right. It seemed like something from Fox News. I thought to myself, You’ve got some nerve, lady, giving a speech like this. Nobody knows anything about you except these tabloidesque revelations that have dribbled out over the last few days, and this is the speech you give?

She’s definitely got chutzpah. But that seems to be it.

And when you combine it with Nosferatu’s Giuliani’s speech, wasn’t last night all very Pat Buchanan 1992? And apparently Rudy’s speech ran long, so they had to cut out Palin’s biographical film in order to stay in prime time. But it went past prime time anyway.

I swear, I fear and loathe this woman. I don’t know what it is.

Sarah Palin Trainwreck

If it’s not at all obvious (ya think?), I’m enthralled by the Sarah Palin trainwreck.

I agree with Andy that there’s a strong chance she won’t be on the ballot in November. They’ll find a way for her to withdraw for personal or health reasons while saving McCain as much face as possible. Reasons can always be found in politics, just as Charles Krauthammer scripted a withdrawal scenario for Harriet Miers.

Palin isn’t helping him with women, but she’s firing up the base, so if he replaces her with someone who’s not a social conservative, they’ll revolt. So he’ll wind up picking Huckabee (or maybe Jindal if he comes off looking good from Gustav, even though he has even less gubernatorial experience than Palin?).

But I actually don’t want her to leave the ticket — as long as she helps McCain lose. She’s proving to be a horrible distraction and I love it. (I’d make a reference to “Hurricane Palin,” but it’s been done.)

My Friends

Why can’t McCain stop saying “My friends”?

[I]n the last half-century it’s been exclusively resorted to by the worst orators in our presidential races.

What happened to change the phrase’s status in our language after Eisenhower’s 1956 speech? I have my own unprovable pet theory: It’s because the following year saw The Music Man debut on Broadway. Ever since, the phrase has been irrevocably associated with old-timey con men in straw boaters: “My friends, you got trouble right here in River City!

Kristol Flip-Flops on Palin

The world is awash in bullshit.

Bill Kristol, just five days ago:

[W]ith Biden’s foreign policy experience as a contrast, could McCain assure voters that the young Pawlenty is ready to take over, if need be, as commander in chief? Also, Biden is a strong and experienced debater. Pawlenty is unproven. If he is the choice, there will be many anxious Republicans in the run-up to the vice presidential debate in St. Louis on Oct. 2.

If not Pawlenty or Romney, how about a woman, whose selection would presumably appeal to the aforementioned anguished Hillary supporters? It’s awfully tempting for the McCain camp to revisit the possibility of tapping Meg Whitman, the former eBay C.E.O., Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, or Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska. But the first two have never run for office, and Palin has been governor for less than two years.

Bill Kristol, today:

Palin is potentially a huge asset to McCain. He took the gamble–wisely, we think–of putting her on the ticket.

A key moment for Palin will be the vice presidential debate, to be held at Washington University in St. Louis on October 2. … And if Palin holds her own against Biden, as she is fully capable of doing? McCain will then have succeeded in combining with his own huge advantage in experience and judgment, a politician of great promise in his vice presidential slot who will make Joe Biden look like a tiresome relic.

Can Bill Kristol even distinguish bullshit from reality anymore?

Harry Frankfurt, in his book On Bullshit:

It is impossible for someone to lie unless he thinks he knows the truth. Producing bullshit requires no such conviction. A person who lies is thereby responding to the truth, and he is to that extent respectful of it. When an honest man speaks, he says only what he believes to be true; and for the liar, it is correspondingly indispensable that he considers his statements to be false. For the bullshitter, however, all these bets are off: he is neither on the side of the true nor on the side of the false. His eye is not on the facts at all, as the eyes of the honest man and of the liar are, except insofar as they may be pertinent to his interest in getting away with what he says. He does not care whether the things he says describe reality correctly. He just picks them out, or makes them up, to suit his purpose.

We must always call out the bullshitters. If we take them seriously, we give them power. That’s why we must always mock them and laugh at them — to show them as the worthless cretins they are. We must not let them poison the well of ideas.

Historians on Palin

Politico interviewed some political historians about Sarah Palin.

Presidential scholars say she appears to be the least experienced, least credentialed person to join a major-party ticket in the modern era.

If elected vice president, Palin would appear to have the least amount of experience in federal office or as a governor since John W. Kern, Democrat William Jennings Bryan’s 1908 running mate, who had served for four years in the Indiana state Senate and then four more as city solicitor of Indianapolis. The Democratic ticket lost to Republican standard bearer William Howard Taft and running mate James S. Sherman by an Electoral College spread of 321-162.

Palin = Huckabee

Human beings like to analogize.

So I’ve realized that Sarah Palin is also a female Mike Huckabee. A folksy, culturally right-wing governor who will fire up the base.

And one of my friends on Facebook said that Sarah Palin is to Hillary Clinton as Clarence Thomas is to Thurgood Marshall.

This is in addition to her being Harriet Miers and Dan Quayle.

I alternately think she’s a joke and fear her. Or, rather, I fear what she might do for McCain. The base will probably love her (Dobson likes her), and she might increase evangelical turnout, and that really scares me.

But I can’t imagine the PUMA people supporting her. I’d think/hope they would be insulted that McCain thinks he can win them over just by picking a candidate with ovaries — as insulted as they’d have been if Obama had picked Kathleen Sibelius.

Andrew Sullivan continues to dig up good stuff. Hopefully news organizations will pick up all these mini-scandals in a few days after the excitement wears off, and they’ll suck up oxygen, and they’ll show that Palin wasn’t vetted properly and that McCain is a reckless risk-taker. We’ve already had one of those for the last eight years and we don’t need another.

Oh Ya, Marge

Fivethirtyeight.com:

… picturing a young, attractive, kooky, female governor from Alaska who has an accent straight out of Fargo in the White House is going to be a much bigger leap for many voters than picturing Barack Obama there.

At first I was disappointed he didn’t pick Romney. Romney would have been so much fun to run against. And it’s possible Palin could fire up the base. Instead of aborting a Down-Syndrome baby, she Chose Life. She’s pro-gun, pro-creationism.

But this still seems like a total joke. Harriet Miers redux — she won’t make any major mistakes, but something just doesn’t seem right. This is an example of that vaunted “judgment” McCain keeps attributing to himself?

Hawaii and Alaska

So the presidential nominee of one major party is from Hawaii, and the vice presidential nominee of the other major party is from Alaska. Noncontinental U.S. states represent!

She comes out of nowhere, she’s younger than Obama, and she’s been a state governor for less than two years. And she’d be a heartbeat away from a 72-year-old man’s presidency.

This pretty much undermines one of McCain’s key arguments against Obama.

She seems vastly underqualified to be president.

Is she going to be the Harriet Miers of the VP process?

Del Martin Dies

Del Martin, a gay rights pioneer who founded the Daughters of Bilitis and who recently married her partner of 55 years, Phyllis Lyon, died this morning.

Martin and Lyon were the first couple who San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom married during the city’s powerful act of civil disobedience in 2004. Just a few weeks ago, they were one of the first same-sex couples in California to finally be legally married.

Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon have been special, powerful faces of the same-sex marriage movement. May Del Martin rest in peace.

Frost/Nixon Trailer

The trailer for Frost/Nixon, based on the recent play about David Frost’s 1977 interviews with Richard Nixon, is now out. You can watch it here. (Thanks, Esther!)

It’s written by Peter Morgan, who also brought us The Queen. It stars Frank Langella as Nixon and Michael Sheen as David Frost, who played Tony Blair in The Queen. I saw the play last year and really enjoyed it. If you’re a political junkie, you will too — assuming the movie is as good as the play. (Ron Howard directed the movie. Of course, when the action of the movie took place, Ron Howard was playing Richie Cunningham on Happy Days.)

TV Notes

Goodbye Olympics, hello Democratic National Convention.

Did anyone catch the hilariously awful handoff to London at the closing ceremonies of the Olympics on Sunday night? Double-decker bus, umbrellas, multicolored raincoats, Jimmy Page, David Beckham — it was like watching a terrible Broadway musical. It made Elton John on a trampoline seem like a good idea. The Chinese put the British to shame — although, as the Washington Post’s Anne Applebaum points out, of course authoritarian societies do spectacle really well.

So that’s that for the Olympics.

Did anyone catch the convention coverage last night? And by convention coverage, I mean did anyone catch the TV news anchors interviewing pundits and politicians while ignoring the speakers onstage, except for Ted Kennedy and Michelle Obama?

[A]s CNN analysts were wrapping up the night, several talked about the absence of “red meat” attacks on the Republicans. But Democratic activist Hillary Rosen noted that Pelosi was doing some of that — only CNN wasn’t really listening. …

Several things may explain it. The networks paid to send much of their political talent to Denver, and want to show them off. They fear political speeches may turn off an audience that has, essentially, tuned in for political speeches. And they don’t want to be sucked into an infomercial.

Granted, it is all a giant infomercial. But if people don’t want to watch, they’re not going to watch, and Katie Couric interviewing Nancy Pelosi isn’t going to pull anyone away from America’s Next Top Model or whatever is on TV in the summer.

Now, if they showed Elton John on a trampoline — that might do it.

Sex and the Olympic City

There’s apparently a lot of sex that goes in the Olympic Village, where all the Olympic athletes live.

There is a famous story from Seoul in 1988 that there were so many used condoms on the roof terrace of the British team’s residential block the night after the swimming concluded that the British Olympic Association sent out an edict banning outdoor sex.

Or

Or, you know, they could send out the text message in the middle of the night, and an hour later, when I’m near the waking end of a sleep/wake cycle, an insistent beep from the other room enters my consciousness, the beep that means you have an unread text message, and it wakes me up.

I realize they had been scooped, but come on. The middle of the night?

Chet Edwards Anti-Gay Marriage

This guy better not be Obama’s VP nominee.

I voted for the Marriage Protection Amendment, because I believe marriage is a sacred, time-honored union between a man and a woman. Marriage is a foundation of stability for our families and our nation and should always remain so.

He’s apparently still in the mix, although who the hell really knows anything right now? Reporters like to write stories.